'bought media'

The LA Times is reporting the Pentagon has been paying local Iraqi media to run fluff stories prepared by the US military:

Many of the articles are presented in the Iraqi press as unbiased news accounts written and reported by independent journalists. The stories trumpet the work of U.S. and Iraqi troops, denounce insurgents and tout U.S.-led efforts to rebuild the country.

Though the articles are basically factual, they present only one side of events and omit information that might reflect poorly on the U.S. or Iraqi governments, officials said. Records and interviews indicate that the U.S. has paid Iraqi newspapers to run dozens of such articles, with headlines such as "Iraqis Insist on Living Despite Terrorism," since the effort began this year.

I take it freedom of the press isn't a key component of 'democracy on the march.'

-interlocutor

woeful disregard and such

Talk about your winning of hearts and minds!

A certain latin pederast from a certain Coen Bro's film offered this applicable bon mot: 'This is bush league psyche-out stuff. Laughable, man - ha ha!'

-interlocutor

Another saucy Downing Street memo

The story is that Bush apparently suggested in a conversation with Tony Blair that he ought to bomb al-Jazeera, allegedly in reprisal for airing messages from al-Qaeda and other deeds deemed counter to the cause. Variously, it has been dismissed as a joke — "sounds like one of the president's one-liners" a senior Washington diplomat is quoted as saying to the Washington Post. Elsewhere in the story, the Post offers:

a senior U.S. intelligence official said that it was clear the White House saw al-Jazeera as a problem, but that although the CIA's clandestine service came up with plans to counteract it, such as planting people on its staff, it never received permission to proceed. 'Bombing in Qatar was never contemplated,' the former official said.

Weird deja vue, from a certain other seemingly endless and unwinnable war: bombing in Cambodia was also never contemplated — publicly. But it happened. Maybe that was just a joke too...

Side note: even though it's all just a romp, the Brits are moving to prosecute bureaucrats and journalists responsible for disseminating these official (and, apparently, 'hilarious') state secrets.

-Interlocutor

John McCain is a smart fella

Besides being my personal Republican hero, John McCain is a pretty wise guy. Doing some research on campaign finance, I came across an article about McCain from 2002. If every American politican had the integrity of John McCain, the US would be a really fantastic place to live.

Republicans are angry with John McCain, the senator whose campaign for the Republican presidential nomination nearly derailed George W. Bush in the primaries last year.

The Washington Post spread the word earlier this month that at the regular weekly luncheon for the 49 senators, McCain arrived early and was left by his colleagues to dine alone.

McCain laughed off the story. "Where we dine, you can't dine alone. There aren't enough seats," he said in an interview with The Sunday Times.

"But are some of my colleagues mad at me for ranting at them? Yes, they are."

If they don't want to get mad, he added, they should stop giving him cause to criticize them by wasting taxpayers' money and indulging in the worst kind of pork-barrel politics.

McCain, 64, has emerged as the discomfiting conscience of the Republican party in an era of spectacular party fundraising. Washington under Bush is swilling with cash.

"There's far too much money washing around this town," said McCain. "History shows that if there's too much money, you get corruption and that leads to scandals."

The Republicans have enjoyed a fundraising bonanza since Bush took office, breaking all records in a non-election year. The Republican national committee has raised almost $50 million, the congressional committee almost $39 million and the senate fundraising committee almost $25 million.

The Democrats, spurred on by gaining control of the Senate in May after the defection of James Jeffords from the Republicans, are also living high on the hog.

McCain insists that the explosion of funds is no cause for rejoicing: "I have no doubt it corrupts the system. When someone buys a ticket to a fundraiser for $500,000, as happened last October, that person then deserves and gets access, which leads to influence."

John McCain: 2
Tom Delay & Bill Frist: 0

-Chris-face

Bush pardons turkey, ironically contracts avian flu

Bush, with peer group, delights in petting a turkey.


Today George W. Bush performed the only function he is intellectually qualified to do: Give presidential clemency to an incredibly stupid animal. The animal will live out the rest of it's days in a petting zoo at Disneyland, living a higher standard of life than many americans enjoy.

It was nice of Dick to let George pet the turkey, though. I bet that made his day.

Anti-Democrat posts coming soon, I promise.

"Strategy for Victory"

This odd post-'Mission Accomplished' phrase hovered as the slogan over Bush’s shoulder today as he delivered a Veterans Day speech aimed at regaining the high ground on the war in Iraq; presumably, the exercdise was also meant to turn the tide on plummeting approval ratings now festering somewhere below 40%.

Among the curious barbs, the President accused Democrats of revisionism of events leading up to the war:

While it's perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began. Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war. These critics are fully aware that a bipartisan Senate investigation found no evidence of political pressure to change the intelligence community's judgments related to Iraq's weapons programs.

And in a particularly crass display of Veterans Day political grandstanding, Bush offered the following in summation:

These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an enemy that is questioning America's will. As our troops fight a ruthless enemy determined to destroy our way of life, they deserve to know that their elected leaders who voted to send them to war continue to stand behind them. Our troops deserve to know that this support will remain firm when the going gets tough. And our troops deserve to know that whatever our differences in Washington, our will is strong, our nation is united, and we will settle for nothing less than victory.

John Kerry was reported as saying: "I wish President Bush knew better than to dishonour America's veterans by playing the politics of fear and smear on Veterans Day."

Usually the President visits Arlington National Cemetary on Veterans Day, but Cheney was assigned that duty and was reported as having parroted Bush's message: "we can be certain that by the resolve of our country, by the rightness of our cause...we will prevail."

Between Bush and the Veep it all sounded a bit like an attempt to rescue the justice of the cause, in keeping with that line from Henry V: "methinks I could not die anywhere so contented as in the King's company; his cause being just and his quarrel honourable."

It remains to be seen whether the war can be won on pure piss and vinegar, but in the absence of anything else that seems to remain the "strategy for victory."

Scott McClellan: Athwartful Dodger

The other day, GWB said “We do not torture,” during a speech. Meanwhile, probably at that very moment, Veep Cheney was bouncing around Capitol Hill trying to convince Senator-by-Senator, to exclude the “McCain Amendment” proposed by Senator John McCain, who spent the better part of the late 60’s/Early 70’s hanging from his thumbs in a cell at the Hanoi Hilton. The amendment is to ban US soldiers and agents from “cruel, inhuman and degrading” treatment of captives. Cheney originally threatened a veto from Bush if it passed, but it passed 90-9 in the Senate, and therefore can’t be vetoed at all. Not only has Cheney been trying to get this language out of the bill, he’s trying to insert language that would allow the CIA to do whatever it wants, like shock genitals or put a rat on someone’s stomach, cover it with a metal bucket and then heat the bucket with a blowtorch so that the rat, facing the unbearable heat, attempts to dig into the stomach. Reporters, the troublemakers that they are, caught wind of the Cheneymandering and asked questions to White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan. I thought today was going to be the day that Scott would break down and cry like an American family who gets sent their son’s dog-tags in the mail (too soon?). Honestly, the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room is looking like a venue for an Abbott and Costello Revival these days. The following is from his press briefing today (it’s long, but it’s worth it):

(keep in mind that every time you see “- -“, that means someone has been interrupted)

Q I'd like you to clear up, once and for all, the ambiguity about torture. Can we get a straight answer? The President says we don't do torture, but Cheney --

MR. McCLELLAN: That's about as straight as it can be.

Q Yes, but Cheney has gone to the Senate and asked for an exemption on --

MR. McCLELLAN: No, he has not. Are you claiming he's asked for an exemption on torture? No, that's --

Q He did not ask for that?

MR. McCLELLAN: -- that is inaccurate.

Q Are you denying everything that came from the Hill, in terms of torture?

MR. McCLELLAN: No, you're mischaracterizing things. And I'm not going to get into discussions we have --

Q Can you give me a straight answer for once?

MR. McCLELLAN: Let me give it to you, just like the President has. We do not torture.
He does not condone torture and he would never --

Q I'm asking about exemptions.

MR. McCLELLAN: Let me respond. And he would never authorize the use of torture. We have an obligation to do all that we can to protect the American people. We are engaged --

Q That's not the answer I'm asking for --

MR. McCLELLAN: It is an answer -- because the American people want to know that we are doing all within our power to prevent terrorist attacks from happening. There are people in this world who want to spread a hateful ideology that is based on killing innocent men, women and children. We saw what they can do on September 11th --

Q He didn't ask for an exemption --

MR. McCLELLAN: -- and we are going to --
Q -- answer that one question. I'm asking, is the administration asking for an exemption?

MR. McCLELLAN: I am answering your question. The President has made it very clear that we are going to do --

Q You're not answering -- yes or no?

MR. McCLELLAN: No, you don't want the American people to hear what the facts are, Helen, and I'm going to tell them the facts.

Q -- the American people every day. I'm asking you, yes or no, did we ask for an exemption?

MR. McCLELLAN: And let me respond. You've had your opportunity to ask the question. Now I'm going to respond to it.

Q If you could answer in a straight way.

MR. McCLELLAN: And I'm going to answer it, just like the President -- I just did, and the President has answered it numerous times.

Q -- yes or no --

MR. McCLELLAN: Our most important responsibility is to protect the American people. We are engaged in a global war against Islamic radicals who are intent on spreading a hateful ideology, and intent on killing innocent men, women and children.

Q Did we ask for an exemption?

MR. McCLELLAN: We are going to do what is necessary to protect the American people.

Q Is that the answer?

MR. McCLELLAN: We are also going to do so in a way that adheres to our laws and to our values. We have made that very clear. The President directed everybody within this government that we do not engage in torture. We will not torture. He made that very clear.

Q Are you denying we asked for an exemption?

MR. McCLELLAN: Helen, we will continue to work with the Congress on the issue that you brought up. The way you characterize it, that we're asking for exemption from torture, is just flat-out false, because there are laws that are on the books that prohibit the use of torture. And we adhere to those laws.

Q We did ask for an exemption; is that right? I mean, be simple -- this is a very simple question.

MR. McCLELLAN: I just answered your question. The President answered it last week.

Q What are we asking for?

Q Would you characterize what we're asking for?

MR. McCLELLAN: We're asking to do what is necessary to protect the American people in a way that is consistent with our laws and our treaty obligations. And that's what we --

Q Why does the CIA need an exemption from the military?

MR. McCLELLAN: David, let's talk about people that you're talking about who have been brought to justice and captured. You're talking about people like Khalid Shaykh Muhammad; people like Abu Zubaydah.

Q I'm asking you --

MR. McCLELLAN: No, this is facts about what you're talking about.

Q Why does the CIA need an exemption from rules that would govern the conduct of our military in interrogation practices?

MR. McCLELLAN: There are already laws and rules that are on the books, and we follow those laws and rules. What we need to make sure is that we are able to carry out the war on terrorism as effectively as possible, not only --

Q What does that mean --

MR. McCLELLAN: What I'm telling you right now -- not only to protect Americans from an attack, but to prevent an attack from happening in the first place. And, you bet, when we capture terrorist leaders, we are going to seek to find out information that will protect -- that prevent attacks from happening in the first place. But we have an obligation to do so. Our military knows this; all people within the United States government know this. We have an obligation to do so in a way that is consistent with our laws and values.
Now, the people that you are bringing up -- you're talking about in the context, and I think it's important for the American people to know, are people like Khalid Shaykh Muhammad, Abu Zubaydah, Ramzi Binalshibh -- these are -- these are dangerous killers.

Q So they're all killers --

Q Did you ask for an exemption on torture? That's a simple question, yes or no.

MR. McCLELLAN: No. And we have not. That's what I told you at the beginning.

Q You want to reserve the ability to use tougher tactics with those individuals who you mentioned.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, obviously, you have a different view from the American people. I think the American people understand the importance of doing everything within our power and within our laws to protect the American people.

Q Scott, are you saying that Cheney did not ask --

Q What is it that you want the -- what is it that you want the CIA to be able to do that the U.S. Armed Forces are not allowed to do?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm not going to get into talking about national security matters, Bill. I don't do that, because this involves --

Q This would be the exemption, in other words.

MR. McCLELLAN: This involves information that relates to doing all we can to protect the American people. And if you have a different view -- obviously, some of you on this room -- in this room have a different view, some of you on the front row have a different view.

Q We simply are asking a question.

Q What is the Vice President -- what is the Vice President asking for?

MR. McCLELLAN: It's spelled out in our statement of administration policy in terms of what our views are. That's very public information. In terms of our discussions with members of Congress --

Q -- no, it's not --

MR. McCLELLAN: In terms of our members -- like I said, there are already laws on the books that we have to adhere to and abide by, and we do. And we believe that those laws and those obligations address these issues.

Q So then why is the Vice President continuing to lobby on this issue? If you're very happy with the laws on the books, what needs change?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, you asked me -- you want to ask questions of the Vice President's office, feel free to do that. We've made our position very clear, and it's spelled out on our website for everybody to see.

Q We don't need a website, we need you from the podium.

MR. McCLELLAN: And what I just told you is what our view is.

Q But Scott, do you see the contradiction --

MR. McCLELLAN: Jessica, go ahead.

And then, a little bit later…

MR. McCLELLAN: You bet, the President is going to act to do what he can to prevent an attack from happening on the American people. That's what the American people expect. But we're going to do so consistent with our laws and values, and we've made that repeatedly clear.

Q So what is the Vice President lobbying for? And is he doing it on behalf of the White House, or is he operating independently?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, I just said we're going to continue to work with Congress.
Go ahead.

Q Why don't you answer the one question on exemption?
MR. McCLELLAN: I just did, Helen.

Q Does the Vice President's Office have -- I mean, you blanket -- covered the White House. The Vice President's Office is under the Office of the White House. Why can't you just -- why can't you answer?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm not going to get into all the discussions we have with members of Congress. If they want to add additional information, you're welcome to contact their office, as well.

Q Well, they don't answer like you do. You are at that podium. We need to hear from you. You --

MR. McCLELLAN: And I just made it clear --

Q -- are the Press Secretary for all --

MR. McCLELLAN: There's a statement of administration policy that has been put out. And -- but let's talk about what this issue is relating to. This issue is relating to the protection of the American people and making sure that the President of the United States has the tools he needs to be able to prevent attacks from happening, and to be able to stop those terrorists who still seek to do us harm from carrying out their attacks in the first place.

Q -- the Vice President wants torture? Which --

MR. McCLELLAN: Wrong. That is absolutely false.

Q Well, then tell us --

MR. McCLELLAN: The President has made it very clear that we do not torture.

Q What is the Vice President doing?

MR. McCLELLAN: I just told you.

Q You have not. I'm not trying to be --

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm not going to let you -- you are mischaracterizing what this is about.

Q Scott, no, we want to know --

MR. McCLELLAN: It's clearly in the statement of administration policy. April, look, you can keep showboating for the cameras, but we've made clear what our views are. [Keep in mind that he is speaking with April Ryan, who is a the correspondent for the American Urban Radio Networks]

Q Thank you -- I showboat well, thank you --

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you are. Let's be honest about it.

Q I'm being honest. I want an honest answer from you.

MR. McCLELLAN: And you got it in the statement of administration policy.

Q -- in the website. That is not -- that is not --

MR. McCLELLAN: You got it in the statement of administration policy. There are already laws on the books that cover these issues.

Q -- this issue --

MR. McCLELLAN: Yes, and that's what it is.

Q Well, give it to us then.

MR. McCLELLAN: Go look on our website. I'll be glad to provide it to you.

Q -- which website?

MR. McCLELLAN: And I just told you what it is. Are you not listening? I just told you
what it is.

Q Scott, the Department of Defense is revising --

MR. McCLELLAN: I think you need to calm down a little bit and let me respond.
Go ahead.

And then he finished with this, speaking to the job of Press Secretary:

MR. McCLELLAN: -- look forward to continuing to do it. Sure, I enjoy it because -- an important topic was raised at the beginning of this briefing, and I'm glad to talk about it. Some were intent on trying to jump in and not let me respond fully. And I understand that. They're just trying to do their job. But there are important -- there are important points that need to be made to the American people. There is a reminder that we will continue to make to the American people. Also, I love sodomy.